Vol. 32  No. 7               JULY  2003

 

HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE

 

JPIA BOND SALE

 

MACo MEETINGS

 

A.G. LETTER OF ADVICE:  MILL LEVY

 

WOLVES

 

PUBLIC HEALTH

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

 

COUNTY NEWS

 

NRIS SEMINARS

 

LAPTOP ERGONOMICS

 

ELECTION REFORMS

 

 

HOMELAND DEFENSE FUNDING

EVOLVING

Three different sources are contributing to Montana’s Disaster and Emergency Services funding:

1.  Emergency Management Performance Grants (EMPG) are the only source of direct federal funding for state and local government that can be used to provide basic emergency coordination and planning capabilities.  EMPG, which is part of the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), provides states the flexibility to allocate funds according to risk vulnerabilities and to address the most urgent state and local needs for disaster mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery.  States award funds to local governments on a 50% / 50% split.

            Montana receives $1,542,988 of the nationwide amount of $165,140,000.

 

2.  The Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP), within the new Department of Homeland Security, manages $1.3 billion in grants for state and local first responders.  The grants are for equipment, training, exercises and planning.  States must allocate 80% of the equipment funds to local governments within 45 days.  Montana’s allocation is $5,303,000. 

            The formula for these funds may be changing.  Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge urges a change in the grant formulas, which are now based on population, to reflect an area’s vulnerability and likelihood of terrorist threat.  NACo supports any changes to the program which will continue funding to both large and rural counties. 

 

3.  The War Supplemental program is designed for security and response services.  Governor Judy Martz recently announced $14,047,000 for funding to Montana. 

 

            Montana’s DES mission for the new funds is to “coordinate efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to and recover from terrorist attacks within Montana.“ General goals are:
1.   Assess risk in Montana

2.       Enhance response capabilities

3.       Increase coordination and interoperability

4.   Better prepare our state

5.       Improve use of technological capabilities.

 

Montana county funding levels will be presented in the August MACo News.

 

 

JPIA BOND SALE

FOR

LIABILITY REINSURANCE

The MACo Property and Liability Insurance Program issued bonds to fund a self-insurance layer of coverage for the liability portion of the program.  This approach was modeled on the successful MACo Workers’ Compensation bond program, which was paid off early.

            The amount needed to cover the annual debt service on $5,000,000 worth of bonds is at the same level as the current annual reinsurance premium.   This should result in stabilization of premium costs.

            Each of the 45 member counties adopted a Resolution of Intention to participate in the bonding, to enter into the Liability Program and to adopt and issue a promissory note.  The promissory notes are payable over 20 years.  Neither the amount of the current premium nor the amount for the debt service on the bonds is outside the general property tax limitations. 

            The final closing on the bond sale occurred June 23 at the MACo offices.  Current coverage expired June 30.  On July 1, the MACo Liability Reinsurance became self-insured. 

 

MONTANA STATE TRAVEL RATES

The recent Legislature did not change the current rates for employee travel.

These rates continue:

 

Motel / Hotel Rooms:

            October 16 — May 14             $35 a night

            May 15 — October 15             $55 a night

                        (except Big Sky at $125,

Polson/Kalispell at $64 in summer / $55 in winter,

West Yellowstone  $92 in summer / $55 in winter)

 

Mileage

            36¢ a mile up to 1,000 miles; then 33¢

 

Per Diem

            $5            Morning meal

            $6            Mid-day meal

            $12            Evening meal             TOTAL  $23

 

 

FALL DISTRICT MEETINGS

SUGGESTED AGENDA ITEMS

1.       District Chair nominations and selection                5.   Mental Health summit

2.       Officer nominations                                        6.   Homeland Security

3.   Workforce Investment Board nominations                7.   MACo Conference

4.   NACo Full membership proposal                                              8.   PILT assessment; dues

 

 

DISTRICT COURTS

AND

LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

 

            More than sixty people representing 41 counties learned of impacts from the recent legislation for district courts (SB 490 and HB 489).  The meeting was sponsored by MACo and the Association of District Clerks of Court.         

Sessions covering the biennial legislative appropriation and the reimbursement process were conducted by Jim Oppedahl, Court Administrator for the Montana Supreme Court.  In addition, the current ACLU lawsuit concerning indigent defense and public defenders was presented by MACo and Katrina Martin from Utick and Grosfield   

            The afternoon was devoted to a general meeting for the district clerks of court.

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

June 5, 2003

Selections from Minutes

 

Budget FY04

Dan Watson, Fiscal Officer

WIR dues and expenses will increase by $4,200 over the next two years. The Board is considering a PILT assessment of 0.001% of the prior year’s PILT receipts, with a minimum of either $10 per county or $50 per county.  MACo will advise members during the August District meetings.

            Watson stated that concern over lack of reserves could be addressed by a dues increase. The Board opted to request that the Tax and Finance Committee prepare a proposal for dues increase for FY 2004-5, not in conjunction with the WIR assessment.

 

100% NACo Membership

Gary Fjelstad, Past President

            Fjelstad pointed out that nine Montana counties were not NACo members.   In return for full membership MACo would receive 7 registrations worth $2,520, a $2,000 association bonus for full membership, and a 25% rebate to the state association for the members dues  ($720).  MACo would also have an additional member on the NACo Board of Directors.  MACo Board agreed to pay the dues for these counties to achieve 100% participation

            Fjelstad acknowledged that this would require a lobbying effort on the part of both the Executive Committee and the Board, in order to keep the nine counties paying their own dues the next year.   This will be discussed at the district meetings.

 

Dues Committee

Howard Gipe, Urban Counties

            Urban Counties are asking Board approval for a MACo committee, presided over

by the MACo President, with two urban county representatives (Commissioners Bill Carey, Missoula, and Howard Gipe, Flathead) plus two members appointed by the MACo President. Gipe advised the Board it was their intent that the committee explore the possibilities of restructuring the Board representation and Association dues.

 

Mental Health Summit

Bill Kennedy, 1st Vice President

            The MACo Health and Human Service Committee will be the base for a mental health summit to include health center chairs, providers, system users and others. A planning committee will set “when and where” for the summit in August or September.

 

OTHER BUSINESS     

            The Executive Committee will seek an “Executive Committee to Executive Committee” meeting with Montana Contractors Association. This should be coordinated with the Transportation Committee

            IRS is coming after taxes associated with the reimbursement of commuting mileage. Reimbursements for commuting costs must be reported as gross income.

 

 

Attorney General

LETTER OF ADVICE

 

Attorney General Opinion was requested by Nickolas Murnion, Garfield County Attorney.

 

Dear Mr. Murnion,

            You have requested an opinion from the Attorney General as to the following question:

            Is Garfield County required to obtain voter approval to authorize the county to impose a mill levy sufficient to generate the amount of property taxes actually assessed in the prior year from both voted and non-voted levies for health care facilities?

            Since your question can be answered by reference to the governing statutes as construed in a prior opinion of this office, it has been determined that this letter of advice rather than a formal opinion is appropriate in response to your question.

            In 2001, the Montana legislature adopted fundamental changes to the manner in which local property taxes are assessed and accounted for.  With reference to your question, the legislature repealed numeric limits on various local property tax levies for specific purposes and amended MCA 15-10-420 to cap local property tax levies at the number of mills required to raise the amount raised from property taxes in the prior year, adjusted for inflation.  Thus, as you note in your letter, the ten mill limit on property taxes for county hospital purposes previously provided in MCA 7-6-2512 (1999) has been repealed, and Garfield County’s property tax mill levy has been capped as provided in MCA 15-10-420 (2001).

            In his opinion 49-5 (2001) Attorney General McGrath held that the mill levy cap provided in MCA 15-10-420 (1) (a) (2001) applies to all property tax mills levied by the county that are not expressly excluded from the cap, and not to the mills levied for individual purposes under statutes such as MCA 7-6-2512.  In that opinion, the Attorney General held that the City of Great Falls’ mill levy for airport purposes in FY 2002 was not limited by the number of mills levied in 2001.  Rather, the city was permitted to levy enough mills to raise the same amount of money raised by its property tax levy for all purposes subject to the cap provided in MCA 15-10-420, adjusted for inflation as provided in the statute, and the local government had the discretion to allocate to the airport authority whatever amount it chose from the amount raised. 

            Under this interpretation of the statute, Garfield County is authorized to levy sufficient mills for FY 2004 to raise the amount raised from property taxes in FY 2003, adjusted for inflation.  It is up to the county commission then to determine what portion of that revenue will be allocated to the county hospital.  No election is required to authorize a levy sufficient to raise the amount allowed by the statute.  Rather, MCA 15-10-425 quite clearly provides that an election is required only to impose a new mill levy, to increase a mill levy that is required by law to be submitted to voters, or to levy mills that would raise an amount in excess of the amount raised by property tax mills that are subject to MCA 15-10-420 (1)(a) levied in the previous year, adjusted for inflation.

            This letter of advice may not be cited as an Opinion of the Attorney General

                                    S/ Chris D. Tweeten

                                    Chief Civil Counsel

 

 

GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE RE-DEDICATION

            Gallatin County invites Montana county officials to celebrate the complete remodeling and restoration of the Courthouse on Friday, August 8, with opening ceremony at 9:00 am.  In conjunction with that event, they also have the honor of displaying the United States Declaration of Independence, which is touring the country. 

            The remodeling project features new heat, air, electrical, and computer systems which were incorporated in a historically-sensitive manner.  Other high tech features include a DLP projector, 12' x 9' screen, remote-controlled window shades and lighting, and leading edge sound/recording system. The project was phased in over 4½ years.  Montana counties that are preparing to remodel and/or update their courthouses will want to tour the courthouse and visit with the architect and contractors.

 

 

Wolves

Since 1974, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) has managed wolves under the Endangered Species Act.  The biological recovery goal for the northern Rockies wolf population is 30 or more breeding pairs for three years in the combined states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.  The biological requirements for recovery were met in 2002. 

            Before USFWS will de-list, federal managers must be confident that the population of gray wolves will persist.  To provide that assurance, Montana is to present a plan.  Upon approval of the state plan, management authority for wolves will return to the state governments where wolves reside.  Under Montana statute, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) is the agency charged with wildlife management. 

            Montana’s Plan offers five alternatives. 

1)  No action; 2)  Updated Plan from the Governor’s Council; 3)  Additional Wolves; 4)  Minimal Wolves; and 5)  USFWS and Alternative Two.  (Public comment period for the FWP proposed plan for wolf management has ended.) 

            For the first five years after the gray wolf is de-listed, FWP will be required to document that the wolf population is secure within Montana.        

Draft Environmental Impact Statement March 2003

                                                                                                Montana Gray Wolf Conservation and Management Plan

 

                The 2003 Montana Legislature passed four bills relating to wolf status:

   HB 262—Management of Predators

   HB 283—Analyzing Costs Associated with Wolves

   HJR 32—Wolf De-listing

   SB 209—Annual Game Counts; Maintaining Species

 

                Some Montana counties are hoping to affect future actions for wolf re-introduction by passing resolutions or supporting other statements. 

            The Phillips County resolution prohibits “the presence, introduction or reintroduction of wolves” inside the county boundaries.  Commissioner Carol Kienenberger said there has been no talk of introducing wolves, but the resolution is a pre-emptive move. “We have seen the problems that have arisen with wolf reintroduction in other counties.  We would prefer they aren’t introduced here,” she said.  In their comments on the FWP draft wolf management plan, the Commission wrote, We feel that it is a must to get the wolf de-listed for the sake of our farmers, ranchers, hunters and, in general, the safety of all of our citizens.  We prefer Alternative #2 with a couple of exceptions.  They are to establish a zone for the wolf population and give landowners more flexibility in the Central and Eastern Zones of the state of Montana.   We believe that the administration, de-listing language from Alternative #4 should be added to the Central and Eastern Zone in Alternative #2.”

            Lake, Carbon and Fergus Counties concurred with the Montana Shooting Sports Association comments on the FWP plan which recommends a new alternative that would most closely resemble "Alternative 4 Minimal Wolves".  The new alternative would spell out the requirements from new 2003 state legislation.

            Fergus County has concerns with plans for the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument and the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, which could become home for wolf packs.  Commissioner Carl Seilstad said, “In the case it is ever talked about, Fergus County does not want wolves in the county.”

                Carbon County Commissioner Albert Brown reports four recent depredation incidents in the County from groups of wolves.

            Valley County Commissioner Dave Pippin said, “The fact remains that wolves are predators whether they are endangered or not.”

            Choteau County Commission Chair Ken Evans said, “Livestock is one of our biggest enterprises.  We need to have control.”

 

            In addition to statements and actions by county officials, other public comments include:

            The grizzly, the mountain lion, the eagle...all of these, at one time or another, have been endangered and had to be protected.  Wolf management should stay with the federal level.

            Even if wolves were vegetarians I think some people would hate them.

            Everyone needs to learn how to deal with this predator.

            The problem arises when one considers the results of forcing wolves into public land, mostly in western Montana, rather than a more equitable, wider pattern of distribution. 

                                                                        Some sections are from Great Falls Tribune

                                                                                                “Counties Making it Clear: No Wolves” by Sonja Lee

 

 

MONTANA PUBLIC HEALTH

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

AND

RESPONSE CAPACITY

            Fifty counties and seven reservations responded to a recent assessment of Montana counties and the ability to respond to public health emergencies.  (Data was not available for Granite, Jefferson, Liberty, Lincoln, Phillips and Pondera Counties.)  35 public health agencies are county agencies and 15 are city-county agencies. 

 

Preparedness Planning

             Public Health Emergency Response Plans were most often addressed in local DES plans. Some rural counties have no plans at all.    No plans address the procurement and use of personal protective equipment for radiological agents, the verification of provisional credentials, or professional liability coverage. 

            More than half of the public health agencies (36) have designated a public health emergency coordinator and most (43) have identified legal counsel for emergencies.

            38 agencies have directories with emergency contact information.  46 agencies collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions and have members on the local emergency preparedness group.  Most agreements with emergency response partners are informal and unwritten.

Epidemiology Capacity

            40 counties have designated epidemiology contact persons.  45 counties employ public health nurses and 34 have registered sanitarians. 

More than half of the agencies can disseminate medical management information to local response partners within one hour of an event. 

Laboratory Capacity

            About half of the agencies have laboratory services in their jurisdiction to investigate emergency incidents within four hours of notification.  Only fourteen public health agencies have access to microbiology labs to rule out presence of anthrax, brucellosis, tularemia and plague.

 

Sixteen counties have formalized agreements with the state lab to perform testing if local labs cannot provide the level of testing that is needed.  35 out of 53 agencies have key contact people in law enforcement to whom they can communicate lab results.  However, there are few formal agreements with law enforcement or first responders to ensure proper handling of specimens. 

Communications Network

            37 agencies have formal health alert systems, although only a few operate 24 / 7.  Only ten agencies have tested the capacity to reach response partners.  At least 35 agencies use patient identifiers to protect from unauthorized access and routinely conduct data backup. 

Health Information Dissemination

            Only 15 public health agencies have an emergency response plan.  The most common item is the link with an Emergency Operations Center to release reports and health alerts.  However, almost all agencies (47) use media channels (printed and broadcast) to disseminate information. 

            Twenty agencies produce printed information on anthrax and smallpox and a third of the counties provide facts on biological agents and other public health threats. 

 

Education and Training

            Several public health agencies responded to a public health emergency in the past twelve months, but few have participated in any training exercises.  Over half of the agencies cover expenses for staff to attend training and most train their own staffs.  Most agencies participate in joint training with state public health agencies, LEPC or TERC.  Almost all agencies allow employees to take courses during work hours (43) and use Internet (44), but lack of time is perceived as a barrier.  Phone conferencing, computer conferencing and satellite downlinks are also used. 

            Training subjects have included disease reporting and investigation; basic education on biological and chemical agents, and incident command systems.

 

 

COUNTY NEWS

BUDGET PLANNING

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY is considering a public vote for funds to comply with new federal election requirements. (see article page 10)

 

RAVALLI COUNTY is ending its “in-lieu-of” payments for employees who opted out of the county-provided health insurance; in addition, it is considering a switch from composite rate health insurance (all employees pay the same amount) to a tiered system to reflect family size.

 

BLAINE COUNTY is considering a switch in health insurance coverage from variable premiums based on age to a plan which has a fixed premium regardless of age.

 

CUSTER COUNTY, following retirement of the Cemetery sexton, split sexton duties between the Extension Office, and the weed /mosquito district supervisor and crew.

 

PARK COUNTY is considering alternatives for upgrading its solid waste incinerator, such as closing the incinerator and shipping waste out of the county or shortening the number of days per week for incineration.  The County must let the state know its plans by September and must complete improvements by May 2005. 

 

FALLON COUNTY is contracting at $30 / hour for work to fulfil the GASB 34 Fixed Asset and Inventory requirements .

 

WEEDS

BUTTE SILVER-BOW COUNTY has received a State Noxious Weed Trust Fund grant for weed control along the Big Hole River in BUTTE-SILVER BOW, BEAVERHEAD, MADISON, and ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTIES.

 

BROWNFIELDS

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY is working with Billings on a possible application for a grant to clean up problem properties that have been rendered unmarketable due to possible contamination.

 

CASCADE COUNTY and the City-County Planning Department have reached the next stage for grants  for petroleum and hazardous material cleanup. 

 

LIBRARIES

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY will be participating in discussions for a combined city/county/school district/University library.

 

FERGUS COUNTY has been asked to continue the one-time increased level of funding approved for last year’s library budget.

 

9-1-1

LINCOLN COUNTY is asking FLATHEAD COUNTY to serve as the public safety answering center for the north end of Lincoln County.

 

DEVELOPMENT DISPUTES

RAVALLI COUNTY is in informal settlement negotiations with the landowners denied permission to develop a subdivision.  The land-owners are seeking compensation for lost property value.

 

GALLATIN COUNTY is facing two controversies brought by land- owners.  One is suing over the requirement for a trail easement  to be included as part of a subdivision.  Another homeowner is being asked to either tear down the new house or apply for a zoning variance to allow the roofline to jut over the ridgeline.

 

LEVY MAIL BALLOT

TETON COUNTY mail ballot for a special 10-mill three-year levy for the nursing home passed with a 57% return on ballots.

 

TREASURE STATE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM

Beaverhead County wastewater              $500,000

Blaine County bridges                         322,782

Butte-Silver Bow-Ramsay water   255,000

Cascade County bridges                                 230,840

Cascade County water/waste                    500,000

Cascade County-Black Eagle                       214,200

Flathead County water district                   500,000

Gallatin County bridges                         500,000

Hill County bridges                                 175,803

Judith Basin County water district   330,000

Lake County solid waste district                 500,000

Lake County-Pablo wastewater                 500,000

Lewis & Clark County bridges                     170,575

Madison County bridges                         174,529

Missoula County wastewater                            499,335

Park County-Cooke City water                   500,000

Park County-Gardiner water                      500,000

Phillips County water district                          112,500

Pondera County bridges                         137,500

Richland County bridges                         351,625

Sheridan County bridges                           210,775

Stillwater County bridges                     500,000

Sweet Grass County bridges                     235,954

Teton County-Power water                        500,000

Yellowstone County water district   500,000 

Yellowstone County bridges                                172,710  (tentative)

 

WASHINGTON’S SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONER

Jack Roskelley and his son, Jess (University of Montana student), successfully climbed Mount Everest’s 29,035’ summit.  The climbers endured high winds, sickness, loss of equipment and other team members turning back.  The climb began in March and was concluded at the end of May.  Jess is the youngest American to reach the summit.

 

 

 

Free Information Free Seminars

     Montana's Natural Resource Information System (NRIS) offers Internet access to extensive water information, including fisheries, water quality and quantity and groundwater resources information (wells, water rights).  NRIS also houses the Montana Natural Heritage Program (NHP), where scientists collect, manage, and disseminate biodiversity information on plants, animals, and natural communities.  

     The data is available in GIS format for users to map, overlay, and analyze the information to help make land-based decisions.

 

     NRIS also sponsors free monthly seminars on Friday afternoons at 3:00 pm, except in November:

 

July 25                         NRIS TopoFinder II

 

August 22                    Thematic Mapper

 

September 26             (TBA)

 

October 24                  Census Resources

 

November 19                    2003 GIS Day

 

Dec. 12                       Earthquake Mapping

 

January 23                     Grassland Birds

 

      Each seminar will be at the Montana State Library, 1515 East Sixth, Helena.  Registration is not required; however, attendees are encouraged to contact  Anastasia Burton at 444-5357 or aburton@state.mt.us prior to attending, as occasionally there is a scheduling change.

     NRIS speakers are willing to visit Montana locations with customized presentations which are often free of charge.

        To access data and services, or to learn more about upcoming seminars, visit: 

www.nris.state.mt.us.

 

 

MACo PRESIDENT’S 2003 SCHOLARSHIPS

The 2003 President’s Scholarships have been presented by former MACo President Victor Miller.  The annual scholarships are awarded to graduates from the President’s home county who plan to attend a Montana college.

            Winner of the $1,000 scholarship is Brianne Vialpando-Gone, who is a recent graduate of Harlem High School.  Brianne plans to attend MSU-Bozeman to study neuro-cell biology.  She hopes to become a neurological surgeon.

            Winner of the $500 scholarship is Karlene Egbert, recent graduate of Turner High School.  Karlene plans to attend MSU-Billings to study psychology.  She hopes to become a speech pathologist.

            The scholarships were presented to the recipients during awards ceremonies at their respective schools.

 

 

ANNUAL CONFERENCE

MAKE MOTEL ROOM RESERVATIONS NOW

            MACo Annual Conference will be September 21-24 in Lewistown.  Motels have set aside only a limited number of rooms for MACo guests.  However, if we make reservations early and the motels realize we need more rooms, they will open more to accommodate MACo.  Be sure to ask for rooms set aside for MACo. 

 

Yogo Inn (conference center)

  NO MORE ROOMS AVAILABLE

 

Mountain View

538-3457  (Ilene)

Single  $32.25    Double $42.65

 

Super 8

538-2581  (Annette)

State summer rate  $55 + tax

 

B & B Motel

538-5496

Single  $45         Double  $50

 

Sunset Motel  

538-8741 (Candy)

Single  $34.32    Double  $43.68

 

Trails End Motel  

538-5468       (Julie)

Single  $38         Double  $43

 

Symmes/Wicks House Bed/Breakfast

538-9068            Single  $45 to $75

 

 

ERGONOMIC RISKS FROM LAPTOP COMPUTERS

Presented by Emelia McEwen

MACo Assistant Risk Manager

35,000,000 laptop computers are expected to be produced in 2003!  Dependency on the laptop as a primary workstation has been quickly established in all types of office work.  Some large companies are planning complete shifts from desk-top to laptop models.  However, this convenience of portability has lead to a range of ergonomic situations. 

            The Omaha, Nebraska, police department added laptops to squad cars so officers could perform quick background checks and other high-tech functions while on patrol.  However, awkward postures (twisting from the driver’s seat to the passenger side to access the monitor and keyboard) and barriers to vehicle controls put the project on hold until the ergonomic risks can be resolved.

            In spite of the convenience of mobile computing and the sheer demand for portable workstations, the basic design has changed little in 20 years.  With the keyboard attached to the monitor, neither the neck nor the hands can be comfortably positioned.  Invariably, the neck suffers from being angled and flexed to view the low display.  Studies show that raising the entire unit to accommodate the neck places stress on the shoulders, arms, wrists and hands.  This is a lose-lose design.  In addition, hands can suffer from being too large to navigate the tight keyboard or from isolated finger use from the trackball mouse.  The palm rests in front of the keyboard tend to isolate the typing and mouse movements to individual finger and hand muscles, rather than allowing the forearm to float freely over the keys.  Thumbs become sore from hovering over the touch pad to avoid inadvertently moving the cursor.  Eyestrain can occur from the monitor being too close.

            Suggestions / Recommendations

1.       External Devices    Attach external keyboard / mouse; raise the screen to eye level. 

2.       Docking Stations    Plugging in to a docking station or a port replicator will transform the laptop into a desktop.  Using a simple cable ($13 to $20) to expand the mouse port is an inexpensive fix for part of the problem.

3.       Weight and Protection    The light weight is subject to breaks, costly repairs and less protection.  Carrying cases are more ergonomically correct (padded shoulder straps; backpack design; etc.) but do not offer protection for the equipment.  The average weight of a laptop and attachments, in a carrying case, is 18 to 34 pounds.  According to the American Medical Association, no more than 15% of a person’s body weight should be carried or strapped on for transport.

4.       Monitor Height     Some companies are designing ways to elevate the monitor from the keyboard and mouse. 

 

Laptop Tips

1.      Use external devices 

            Make every effort to set the laptop like a desktop, with the monitor at eye level and the keyboard and mouse at lap level.  Travel with an external keyboard or borrow one; pack a cable splitter so the single port will accommodate both keyboard and mouse; use books to raise the display to eye level.

 

2.       Find laptop-friendly workspaces

            Ignore high tables and use towels and pillows for extra support; use an armless chair for full arm freedom.

 

3.       Pack full sized mouse and keyboard

            Laptop keyboards without number pads may have full sized keys. 

 

4.       Program macros and use shortcuts to decrease keystrokes

 

5.       Beware of getting too comfortable when working at home. 

            Lying on a couch and typing can cause neck and back pain.  Make the effort to be ergonomic at home, too.

 

6.  Carry only the essentials 

              Summarized from “Laptops as primary workstations present ergo risks” by Lori Stotko; Supplement to CTD News  

(Stotko is a registered occupational therapist and certified hand therapist who runs Mid-Peninsula Hand Rehabilitation & Ergonomics in California.  E-mail address:  lori@ergohand.com)

 

 

WESTERN INTERSTATE REGION (WIR)

EISSINGER ELECTED

McCone County Commissioner Connie Eissinger was elected by unanimous ballot to serve as Second Vice President of NACo Western Interstate Region (WIR) at the annual conference in Reno, Nevada.             Eissinger was unopposed for election and will serve through the vice presidencies, becoming WIR President in 2005.

Elected as McCone County Commissioner in 1991, Eissinger has been particularly active on the NACo Public Lands Steering Committee since 1994.  She was awarded WIR's highest honor, the Dale Sowers Award in 2001 in recognition for her efforts on behalf of public lands counties.

            WIR represents the interests of public lands counties, mostly in the Western United States, and is NACo's oldest affiliate. 

 

 

FEDERAL ELECTION REFORM

 

            Each state is guaranteed to receive at least $5 million for meeting the requirements for training poll workers, buying out punch-card and lever voting machines, providing voter education and improving election administration.

            Other grants will be available for improving polling place access for disabled voters, for research and development to improve voting technology, for pilot programs to test new voting systems and equipment and for state protection and advocacy systems.

 

REQUIREMENTS

Each state must:

            Provide voters an opportunity to check for and correct ballot errors in private and independent manner;

            Have a voting system with manual audit capacity;

            Provide at least one voting machine per precinct, accessible to the disabled;

            Provide alternative language accessibility pursuant to the Voting Rights Act;

            Have a voting system whose error rate does not exceed the rate established by the Federal Election Commission;

            Define what constitutes a legal vote for each type of voting machine;

            Provide provisional ballots to ensure no individual is turned away at the polls;

            Maintain clean and accurate voter registration lists;

            Implement a uniform, centralized computerized statewide voter registration database to ensure accurate lists;

            Segregate and separately count ballots cast after poll-closing time, as a result of a court order.

 

Individual voters must:

            Provide a driver’s license or the last four digits of the Social Security number when registering to vote.  If an individual does not have either number, he or she will be assigned a unique identifier.

            Provide identification when they cast their ballots, if they registered by mail.

 

###